<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Easy to Read Articles &#187; IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easyreadarticles.com/Tags/it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easyreadarticles.com</link>
	<description>Best Technical Writing Online , Easy Reading Books and much more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola subsidiary 3LM to offer enterprise-class device management for Android; HTC, Sony Ericsson, others on board</title>
		<link>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/news/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-management-for-android-htc-sony-ericsson-others-on-board/#utm_source=articlesfeed&#038;utm_medium=articlesfeed&#038;utm_campaign=articlesfeed</link>
		<comments>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/news/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-management-for-android-htc-sony-ericsson-others-on-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EasyReadArticles.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3lm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeviceManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three laws of mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThreeLawsOfMobility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-managem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple's been working hard to chip away at RIM's lead in the enterprise over the last couple years by beefing up iOS' IT policy management chops in ways that traditionally only BlackBerry (and the now-marginalized Windows Phone 6.5 / Windows Embedded Ha...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-managem/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/3lm-locked-tablet.jpg" /></a>Apple&#8217;s been working hard to chip away at RIM&#8217;s lead in the enterprise over the last couple years by beefing up iOS&#8217; IT policy management chops in ways that traditionally only BlackBerry (and the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/29/motorola-es400s-earns-its-keep-on-sprint-in-october/">now-marginalized Windows Phone 6.5 / Windows Embedded Handheld platform</a>) have excelled at, but Motorola &#8212; a company that&#8217;s got virtually 100 percent of its skin in the Android game &#8212; would obviously like to see that change. To that end, it acquired a little company called 3LM (that&#8217;s &#8220;Three Laws of Mobility&#8221;) last year that&#8217;s been working on an enterprise management platform for Android, and it appears they&#8217;ve pulled off a bit of a coup &#8212; not only will its parent company be supporting it on devices starting in the second quarter of the year, but devices from competitors like HTC, Sharp, Sony Ericsson, and Pantech are on board, too. A standard software package for this sort of thing is <em>just</em> what IT bosses like to see &#8212; and it could be Android&#8217;s most dangerous strike yet on the enterprise side of the market. Follow the break for Moto&#8217;s press release.
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-managem/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Motorola subsidiary 3LM to offer enterprise-class device management for Android; HTC, Sony Ericsson, others on board</em></a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-managem/">Motorola subsidiary 3LM to offer enterprise-class device management for Android; HTC, Sony Ericsson, others on board</a> originally appeared on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:21:00 EDT.  Please see our <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-managem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/mobile-security/motorolas-big-plans-fix-androids-security-woes-804">InfoWorld</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19862080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-managem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/news/motorola-subsidiary-3lm-to-offer-enterprise-class-device-management-for-android-htc-sony-ericsson-others-on-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HDX versus PC-over-IP</title>
		<link>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/microsoft/hdx-versus-pc-over-ip/#utm_source=articlesfeed&#038;utm_medium=articlesfeed&#038;utm_campaign=articlesfeed</link>
		<comments>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/microsoft/hdx-versus-pc-over-ip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 02:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Momo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terminal Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Career planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux/Unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management/HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyreadarticles.com/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a recent conference, I said, "The remote protocol no longer matters. Both options [Citrix HDX and VMware PC-over-IP] are good enough." While I stand behind that statement -- both protocols are good enough (with caveats of course) -- that doesn't mean that the remote protocol war is over.

For years, there were only two Windows remoting protocols: Microsoft's built-in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and Citrix's add-on Independent Computing Architecture (ICA). Lots of others popped up here and there, some standalone and some that enhanced RDP, but really it was RDP or ICA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article posted by Brian Madden.</p>
<blockquote><p>At a recent conference, I said, &#8220;The remote protocol no longer  matters. Both options [<a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchvirtualdesktop.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid194_gci1370602,00.html">Citrix  HDX</a> and VMware PC-over-IP] are good enough.&#8221; While I stand behind  that statement &#8212; both protocols are good enough (with caveats of  course) &#8212; that doesn&#8217;t mean that the remote protocol war is over.</p>
<p>For years, there were only two Windows remoting protocols:  Microsoft&#8217;s built-in <a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchvirtualdesktop.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid194_gci1417203,00.html">Remote  Desktop Protocol (RDP)</a> and Citrix&#8217;s add-on Independent Computing  Architecture (ICA). Lots of others popped up here and there, some  standalone and some that enhanced <a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchvirtualdesktop.techtarget.com/video/0,297151,sid194_gci1410723,00.html">RDP</a>,  but really it was RDP or ICA.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more.. <a rel="nofollow" title="HDX versus PC-over-IP" href="http://searchvirtualdesktop.techtarget.com/news/column/0,294698,sid194_gci1513852,00.html?track=NL-1197&amp;ad=768316&amp;asrc=EM_NLT_11695598&amp;uid=673678">HDX versus PC-over-IP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/microsoft/hdx-versus-pc-over-ip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT vs. Management</title>
		<link>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/twitter/it-vs-management/#utm_source=articlesfeed&#038;utm_medium=articlesfeed&#038;utm_campaign=articlesfeed</link>
		<comments>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/twitter/it-vs-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 06:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EasyReadArticles.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyreadarticles.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IT vs. Management]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man in a hot air balloon, realizing he was lost, reduced altitude and spotted a woman below. He descended further and shouted to the lady &#8220;Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don&#8217;t know where I am.&#8221;</p>
<p>The woman below replied, &#8220;You&#8217;re in a hot air balloon, hovering approximately 30 feet above the ground. You&#8217;re between 40 and 41 degrees north latitude and between 59 and 60 degrees west longitude.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You must be in IT,&#8221; said the balloonist.</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually I am,&#8221; replied the woman, &#8220;How did you know?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well,&#8221; answered the balloonist, &#8220;everything you have told me is technically correct but I&#8217;ve no idea what to make of your information and the fact is I&#8217;m still lost. Frankly, you&#8217;ve not been much help at all. If anything, you&#8217;ve delayed my trip.&#8221;</p>
<p>The woman below responded, &#8220;You must be in Management.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I am,&#8221; replied the balloonist, &#8220;but how did you know?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well,&#8221; said the woman, &#8220;you don&#8217;t know where you are or where you&#8217;re going. You have risen to where you are due to a large quantity of hot air. You made a promise, which you&#8217;ve no idea how to keep, and you expect people beneath you to solve your problems. The fact is you are in exactly the same position you were in before we met, but now, somehow, it&#8217;s my f***ing fault&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.easyreadarticles.com/twitter/it-vs-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

